Skip to content

Glycolysis Gluconeogenesis Comparison Essay

Glycolysis (from glycose, an older term[1] for glucose + -lysis degradation) is the metabolic pathway that converts glucose C6H12O6, into pyruvate, CH3COCOO + H+. The free energy released in this process is used to form the high-energy molecules ATP (adenosine triphosphate) and NADH (reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide).[2][3]

Glycolysis is a determined sequence of ten enzyme-catalyzed reactions. The intermediates provide entry points to glycolysis. For example, most monosaccharides, such as fructose and galactose, can be converted to one of these intermediates. The intermediates may also be directly useful. For example, the intermediate dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP) is a source of the glycerol that combines with fatty acids to form fat.

Glycolysis is an oxygen independent metabolic pathway, meaning that it does not use molecular oxygen (i.e. atmospheric oxygen) for any of its reactions. However the products of glycolysis (pyruvate and NADH + H+) are sometimes metabolized using atmospheric oxygen.[4] When molecular oxygen is used for the metabolism of the products of glycolysis the process is usually referred to as aerobic, whereas if no oxygen is used the process is said to be anaerobic.[5] Thus, glycolysis occurs, with variations, in nearly all organisms, both aerobic and anaerobic. The wide occurrence of glycolysis indicates that it is one of the most ancient metabolic pathways.[6] Indeed, the reactions that constitute glycolysis and its parallel pathway, the pentose phosphate pathway, occur metal-catalyzed under the oxygen-free conditions of the Archean oceans, also in the absence of enzymes.[7] Glycolysis could thus have originated from chemical constraints of the prebiotic world.

Glycolysis occurs in most organisms in the cytosol of the cell. The most common type of glycolysis is the Embden–Meyerhof–Parnas (EMP pathway), which was discovered by Gustav Embden, Otto Meyerhof, and Jakub Karol Parnas. Glycolysis also refers to other pathways, such as the Entner–Doudoroff pathway and various heterofermentative and homofermentative pathways. However, the discussion here will be limited to the Embden–Meyerhof–Parnas pathway.[8]

The entire glycolysis pathway can be separated into two phases:[2]

  1. The Preparatory/Investment Phase – wherein ATP is consumed
  2. The Pay Off Phase – wherein ATP is produced.


The overall reaction of glycolysis is:

+ 2 [NAD]+
+ 2 [ADP]
+ 2 [P]i

+ 2 [NADH]
+ 2 H+
+ 2 [ATP]
+ 2 H2O

The use of symbols in this equation makes it appear unbalanced with respect to oxygen atoms, hydrogen atoms, and charges. Atom balance is maintained by the two phosphate (Pi) groups:[9]

  • Each exists in the form of a hydrogen phosphate anion (HPO42−), dissociating to contribute 2 H+ overall
  • Each liberates an oxygen atom when it binds to an ADP (adenosine diphosphate) molecule, contributing 2 O overall

Charges are balanced by the difference between ADP and ATP. In the cellular environment, all three hydroxyl groups of ADP dissociate into −O and H+, giving ADP3−, and this ion tends to exist in an ionic bond with Mg2+, giving ADPMg. ATP behaves identically except that it has four hydroxyl groups, giving ATPMg2−. When these differences along with the true charges on the two phosphate groups are considered together, the net charges of −4 on each side are balanced.

For simple fermentations, the metabolism of one molecule of glucose to two molecules of pyruvate has a net yield of two molecules of ATP. Most cells will then carry out further reactions to 'repay' the used NAD+ and produce a final product of ethanol or lactic acid. Many bacteria use inorganic compounds as hydrogen acceptors to regenerate the NAD+.

Cells performing aerobic respiration synthesize much more ATP, but not as part of glycolysis. These further aerobic reactions use pyruvate and NADH + H+ from glycolysis. Eukaryotic aerobic respiration produces approximately 34 additional molecules of ATP for each glucose molecule, however most of these are produced by a vastly different mechanism to the substrate-level phosphorylation in glycolysis.

The lower-energy production, per glucose, of anaerobic respiration relative to aerobic respiration, results in greater flux through the pathway under hypoxic (low-oxygen) conditions, unless alternative sources of anaerobically oxidizable substrates, such as fatty acids, are found.


The pathway of glycolysis as it is known today took almost 100 years to fully discover.[10] The combined results of many smaller experiments were required in order to understand the pathway as a whole.

The first steps in understanding glycolysis began in the nineteenth century with the wine industry. For economic reasons, the French wine industry sought to investigate why wine sometime turned distasteful, instead of fermenting into alcohol. French scientist Louis Pasteur researched this issue during the 1850s, and the results of his experiments began the long road to elucidating the pathway of glycolysis.[11] His experiments showed that fermentation occurs by the action of living microorganisms; and that yeast's glucose consumption decreased under aerobic conditions of fermentation, in comparison to anaerobic conditions (the Pasteur Effect).[12]

While Pasteur's experiments were groundbreaking, insight into the component steps of glycolysis were provided by the non-cellular fermentation experiments of Eduard Buchner during the 1890s.[13][14] Buchner demonstrated that the conversion of glucose to ethanol was possible using a non-living extract of yeast (due to the action of enzymes in the extract).[15] This experiment not only revolutionized biochemistry, but also allowed later scientists to analyze this pathway in a more controlled lab setting. In a series of experiments (1905-1911), scientists Arthur Harden and William Young discovered more pieces of glycolysis. .[16] They discovered the regulatory effects of ATP on glucose consumption during alcohol fermentation. They also shed light on the role of one compound as a glycolysis intermediate: fructose 1,6-bisphosphate.[17]

The elucidation of fructose 1,6-diphosphate was accomplished by measuring CO2 levels when yeast juice was incubated with glucose. CO2 production increased rapidly then slowed down. Harden and Young noted that this process would restart if an inorganic phosphate (Pi) was added to the mixture. Harden and Young deduced that this process produced organic phosphate esters, and further experiments allowed them to extract fructose diphosphate (F-1,6-DP).

Arthur Harden and William Young along with Nick Sheppard determined, in a second experiment, that a heat-sensitive high-molecular-weight subcellular fraction (the enzymes) and a heat-insensitive low-molecular-weight cytoplasm fraction (ADP, ATP and NAD+ and other cofactors) are required together for fermentation to proceed. This experiment begun by observing that dialyzed (purified) yeast juice could not ferment or even create a sugar phosphate. This mixture was rescued with the addition of undialyzed yeast extract that had been boiled. Boiling the yeast extract renders all proteins inactive (as it denatures them). The ability of boiled extract plus dialyzed juice to complete fermentation suggests that the cofactors were non-protein in character.[16]

In the 1920s Otto Meyerhof was able to link together some of the many individual pieces of glycolysis discovered by Buchner, Harden, and Young. Meyerhof and his team was able to extract different glycolytic enzymes from muscle tissue, and combine them to artificially create the pathway from glycogen to lactic acid.[18][19]

In one paper, Meyerhof and scientist Renate Junowicz-Kockolaty investigated the reaction that splits fructose 1,6-diphosohate into the two triose phosphates. Previous work proposed that the split occurred via 1,3-diphosphoglyceraldehye plus an oxidizing enzyme and cozymase. Meyerhoff and Junowicz found that the equilibrium constant for the isomerase and aldoses reaction were not affected by inorganic phosphates or any other cozymase or oxidizing enzymes. They further removed diphosphoglyceraldehyde as a possible intermediate in glycolysis.[19]

With all of these pieces available by the 1930s, Gustav Embden proposed a detailed, step-by-step outline of that pathway we now know as glycolysis.[20] The biggest difficulties in determining the intricacies of the pathway were due to the very short lifetime and low steady-state concentrations of the intermediates of the fast glycolytic reactions. By the 1940s, Meyerhof, Embden and many other biochemists had finally completed the puzzle of glycolysis.[19] The understanding of the isolated pathway has been expanded in the subsequent decades, to include further details of its regulation and integration with other metabolic pathways.

Sequence of reactions[edit]

Summary of reactions[edit]

Preparatory phase[edit]

The first five steps are regarded as the preparatory (or investment) phase, since they consume energy to convert the glucose into two three-carbon sugar phosphates[2] (G3P).

The first step in glycolysis is phosphorylation of glucose by a family of enzymes called hexokinases to form glucose 6-phosphate (G6P). This reaction consumes ATP, but it acts to keep the glucose concentration low, promoting continuous transport of glucose into the cell through the plasma membrane transporters. In addition, it blocks the glucose from leaking out – the cell lacks transporters for G6P, and free diffusion out of the cell is prevented due to the charged nature of G6P. Glucose may alternatively be formed from the phosphorolysis or hydrolysis of intracellular starch or glycogen.

In animals, an isozyme of hexokinase called glucokinase is also used in the liver, which has a much lower affinity for glucose (Km in the vicinity of normal glycemia), and differs in regulatory properties. The different substrate affinity and alternate regulation of this enzyme are a reflection of the role of the liver in maintaining blood sugar levels.

Cofactors: Mg2+

G6P is then rearranged into fructose 6-phosphate (F6P) by glucose phosphate isomerase. Fructose can also enter the glycolytic pathway by phosphorylation at this point.

The change in structure is an isomerization, in which the G6P has been converted to F6P. The reaction requires an enzyme, phosphohexose isomerase, to proceed. This reaction is freely reversible under normal cell conditions. However, it is often driven forward because of a low concentration of F6P, which is constantly consumed during the next step of glycolysis. Under conditions of high F6P concentration, this reaction readily runs in reverse. This phenomenon can be explained through Le Chatelier's Principle. Isomerization to a keto sugar is necessary for carbanion stabilization in the fourth reaction step (below).

The energy expenditure of another ATP in this step is justified in 2 ways: The glycolytic process (up to this step) is now irreversible, and the energy supplied destabilizes the molecule. Because the reaction catalyzed by Phosphofructokinase 1 (PFK-1) is coupled to the hydrolysis of ATP (an energetically favorable step) it is, in essence, irreversible, and a different pathway must be used to do the reverse conversion during gluconeogenesis. This makes the reaction a key regulatory point (see below). This is also the rate-limiting step.

Furthermore, the second phosphorylation event is necessary to allow the formation of two charged groups (rather than only one) in the subsequent step of glycolysis, ensuring the prevention of free diffusion of substrates out of the cell.

The same reaction can also be catalyzed by pyrophosphate-dependent phosphofructokinase (PFP or PPi-PFK), which is found in most plants, some bacteria, archea, and protists, but not in animals. This enzyme uses pyrophosphate (PPi) as a phosphate donor instead of ATP. It is a reversible reaction, increasing the flexibility of glycolytic metabolism.[21] A rarer ADP-dependent PFK enzyme variant has been identified in archaean species.[22]

Cofactors: Mg2+

Destabilizing the molecule in the previous reaction allows the hexose ring to be split by aldolase into two triose sugars: dihydroxyacetone phosphate (a ketose), and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate (an aldose). There are two classes of aldolases: class I aldolases, present in animals and plants, and class II aldolases, present in fungi and bacteria; the two classes use different mechanisms in cleaving the ketose ring.

Electrons delocalized in the carbon-carbon bond cleavage associate with the alcohol group. The resulting carbanion is stabilized by the structure of the carbanion itself via resonance charge distribution and by the presence of a charged ion prosthetic group.

Triosephosphate isomerase rapidly interconverts dihydroxyacetone phosphate with glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate (GADP) that proceeds further into glycolysis. This is advantageous, as it directs dihydroxyacetone phosphate down the same pathway as glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate, simplifying regulation.

Pay-off phase[edit]

The second half of glycolysis is known as the pay-off phase, characterised by a net gain of the energy-rich molecules ATP and NADH.[2] Since glucose leads to two triose sugars in the preparatory phase, each reaction in the pay-off phase occurs twice per glucose molecule. This yields 2 NADH molecules and 4 ATP molecules, leading to a net gain of 2 NADH molecules and 2 ATP molecules from the glycolytic pathway per glucose.

The aldehyde groups of the triose sugars are oxidised, and inorganic phosphate is added to them, forming 1,3-bisphosphoglycerate.

The hydrogen is used to reduce two molecules of NAD+, a hydrogen carrier, to give NADH + H+ for each triose.

Hydrogen atom balance and charge balance are both maintained because the phosphate (Pi) group actually exists in the form of a hydrogen phosphate anion (HPO42−),[9] which dissociates to contribute the extra H+ ion and gives a net charge of -3 on both sides.

Here, Arsenate (AsO43−), an anion akin to inorganic phosphate may replace phosphate as a substrate to form 1-arseno-3-phoshoglycerate. This, however, is unstable and readily hydrolyzes to form 3-phosphoglycerate, the intermediate in the next step of the pathway. As a consequence of bypassing this step, the molecule of ATP generated from 1-3 bisphosphoglycerate in the next reaction will not be made, even though the reaction proceeds. As a result, arsenate is an uncoupler of glycolysis.[23]

This step is the enzymatic transfer of a phosphate group from 1,3-bisphosphoglycerate to ADP by phosphoglycerate kinase, forming ATP and 3-phosphoglycerate. At this step, glycolysis has reached the break-even point: 2 molecules of ATP were consumed, and 2 new molecules have now been synthesized. This step, one of the two substrate-level phosphorylation steps, requires ADP; thus, when the cell has plenty of ATP (and little ADP), this reaction does not occur. Because ATP decays relatively quickly when it is not metabolized, this is an important regulatory point in the glycolytic pathway.

ADP actually exists as ADPMg, and ATP as ATPMg2−, balancing the charges at -5 both sides.

Cofactors: Mg2+

Phosphoglycerate mutase isomerises 3-phosphoglycerate into 2-phosphoglycerate.

Summary of aerobic respiration
Eduard Buchner. Discovered cell-free fermentation.
Otto Meyerhof. One of the main scientists involved in completing the puzzle of glycolysis


1. The equations derived by Heath (1968) were applied to data from experiments on rats in four metabolic states: fed, post-absorptive, starved and 2hr. after an eventually lethal injury. The data used were: (a) The fractions of label injected as C1-, C2- and C3-pyruvate (where the prefix indicates the position of labelling) that are incorporated into carbon dioxide and glucose in post-absorptive and injured rats (yields). Yields could be corrected to yields on label taken up by the liver. (b) The (C5-label in glutamate)/(total label in glutamate) ratio in the liver after C2-pyruvate in rats in all four states. (c) The distribution of label within glutamate after C2-pyruvate or C2-alanine in the livers of fed, post-absorptive and starved rats. (d) The distribution of label within glucose after C2-lactate or C2-pyruvate in starved rats. (e) The relative specific radioactivities of pyruvate, aspartate, glutamate and (in two states only) of glucose 6-phosphate after injection of [U-14C]glucose into rats in all four states. These data were previously published, except those after (e) and some after (b) above, which are given in this paper. 2. In addition the concentrations of pyruvate, citrate, glutamate and aspartate in the livers of post-absorptive and injured rats were found. Injury decreased glutamate and citrate concentrations and to a smaller extent aspartate and pyruvate concentrations. 3. Non-steady-state theory showed that most of the data could be used without serious error in steady-state theory. Steady-state theory correlated all but one observation (the relative yields of 14CO2 from C2- and C3-pyruvate) listed after (a)–(e) above within the experimental errors, and gave rough estimates of the rates of pyruvate carboxylation, conversion of pyruvate and fat into acetyl-CoA and utilization of glutamate. The main conclusions were: (a) symmetrization of label in oxaloacetate both in the mitochondrion and in the cytoplasm was far from complete, because oxaloacetate did not equilibrate with fumarate in either. From this and other findings it was deduced: (b) that malate or fumarate or both left the mitochondrion, and not oxaloacetate; (c) that there was a loss from the mitochondrion of a fraction of the malate or fumarate or both formed from succinate, and (d) the resulting deficiency of oxaloacetate for the perpetuation of the tricarboxylic acid cycle was made up from pyruvate in fed and post-absorptive rats, but (e) in the starved rat could only be made up by utilization of glutamate. (f) In the fed rat the tricarboxylic acid cycle ran mostly on pyruvate, but in the post-absorptive and starved rat mostly on fat. (g) In the injured rat the tricarboxylic acid cycle was slowed, label in oxaloacetate was completely symmetrized (cf. conclusion a), and the tricarboxylic acid cycle utilized glutamate. (h) The conclusions were not invalidated by isotopic exchange, i.e. flux of label without net flux of compound, nor by interaction with lipogenic processes. (i) In the kidneys interaction between the tricarboxylic acid cycle and gluconeogenesis was different from in the liver, and was much less. The effects on the theory were roughly assessed, and were small. 4. The experiments and optimum experimental conditions required to check the theory are listed, and several predictions, open to experimental confirmation, are made.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (4.3M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Ashby MM, Heath DF, Stoner HB. A quantitative study of carbohydrate metabolism in the normal and injured rat. J Physiol. 1965 Jul;179(2):193–237.[PMC free article][PubMed]
  • BEUTLER E, YEH MK. A simplified method for the determination of citric acid. J Lab Clin Med. 1959 Jul;54(1):125–131.[PubMed]
  • BHADURI A, SRERE PA. The incorporation of citrate carbon into fatty acids. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1963 Jun 18;70:221–230.[PubMed]
  • BUSCH H. Studies on the metabolism of pyruvate-2-C14 in tumor-bearing rats. Cancer Res. 1955 Jul;15(6):365–374.[PubMed]
  • CAVALLINI D, FRONTALI N. Quantitative determination of keto-acids by paper partition chromatography. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1954 Mar;13(3):439–445.[PubMed]
  • Exton JH, Park CR. Control of gluconeogenesis in liver. I. General features of gluconeogenesis in the perfused livers of rats. J Biol Chem. 1967 Jun 10;242(11):2622–2636.[PubMed]
  • FREEDMAN AD, GRAFF S. The metabolism of pyruvate in the tricarboxylic acid cycle. J Biol Chem. 1958 Aug;233(2):292–295.[PubMed]
  • FREEDMAN AD, RUMSEY P, GRAFF S. The metabolism of pyruvate in the tricarboxylic acid cycle. II. Tissue characteristic metabolism of pyruvate. J Biol Chem. 1960 Jul;235:1854–1855.[PubMed]
  • Friedmann B, Goodman EH, Jr, Weinhouse S. Dietary and hormonal effects on gluconeogenesis in the rat. J Biol Chem. 1965 Oct;240(10):3729–3735.[PubMed]
  • GAITONDE MK. The composition of brain lipoprotein fractions obtained by different procedures. J Neurochem. 1961 Dec;8:234–242.[PubMed]
  • Randle PJ, Newsholme EA, Garland PB. Regulation of glucose uptake by muscle. 8. Effects of fatty acids, ketone bodies and pyruvate, and of alloxan-diabetes and starvation, on the uptake and metabolic fate of glucose in rat heart and diaphragm muscles. Biochem J. 1964 Dec;93(3):652–665.[PMC free article][PubMed]
  • EL HAWARY MFS, THOMPSON RHS. Separation and estimation of blood keto acids by paper chromatography. Biochem J. 1953 Feb;53(3):340–347.[PMC free article][PubMed]
  • Haynes RC., Jr The fixation of carbon dioxide by rat liver mitochondria and its relation to gluconeogenesis. J Biol Chem. 1965 Oct;240(10):4103–4106.[PubMed]
  • Heath DF. The redistribution of carbon label by the reactions involved in glycolysis, gluconeogenesis and the tricarboxylic acid cycle in rat liver. Biochem J. 1968 Nov;110(2):313–335.[PMC free article][PubMed]
  • HEATH DF, DUTTON A. The detection of metabolic products from dimethylnitrosamine in rats and mice. Biochem J. 1958 Dec;70(4):619–626.[PMC free article][PubMed]
  • Heath DF, Stoner HB. Studies on the mechanism of shock. Non-esterified fatty acid metabolism in normal and injured rats. Br J Exp Pathol. 1968 Apr;49(2):160–169.[PMC free article][PubMed]
  • Hems R, Ross BD, Berry MN, Krebs HA. Gluconeogenesis in the perfused rat liver. Biochem J. 1966 Nov;101(2):284–292.[PMC free article][PubMed]
  • Henning HV, Stumpf B, Ohly B, Seubert W. On the mechanism of gluconeogenesis and its regulation. 3. The glucogenic capacity and the activities of pyruvate carboxylase and PEP-carboxylase of rat kidney and rat liver after cortisol treatment and starvation. Biochem Z. 1966 Apr 27;344(3):274–288.[PubMed]
  • HOBERMAN HD, D'ADAMO AF., Jr Coupling of oxidation of substrates to reductive biosyntheses. III. Studies with L- and D-lactates. J Biol Chem. 1960 Feb;235:514–518.[PubMed]
  • von Jagow G, Westermann B, Wieland O. Suppression of pyruvate oxidation in liver mitochondria in the presence of long-chain fatty acid. Eur J Biochem. 1968 Feb;3(4):512–518.[PubMed]
  • KEECH DB, UTTER MF. PYRUVATE CARBOXYLASE. II. PROPERTIES. J Biol Chem. 1963 Aug;238:2609–2614.[PubMed]
  • KOEPPE RE, HAHN CH. Concerning pyruvate metabolism in rat brain. J Biol Chem. 1962 Apr;237:1026–1028.[PubMed]
  • KOEPPE RE, MOURKIDES GA, HILL RJ. Some factors affecting routes of pyruvate metabolism in rats. J Biol Chem. 1959 Sep;234:2219–2222.[PubMed]
  • KREBS H. THE CROONIAN LECTURE, 1963. GLUCONEOGENESIS. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1964 Mar 17;159:545–564.[PubMed]
  • Krebs HA. The redox state of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide in the cytoplasm and mitochondria of rat liver. Adv Enzyme Regul. 1967;5:409–434.[PubMed]
  • Krebs HA, Gascoyne T, Notton BM. Generation of extramitochondrial reducing power in gluconeogenesis. Biochem J. 1967 Jan;102(1):275–282.[PMC free article][PubMed]
  • Krebs HA, Hems R, Weidemann MJ, Speake RN. The fate of isotopic carbon in kidney cortex synthesizing glucose from lactate. Biochem J. 1966 Oct;101(1):242–249.[PMC free article][PubMed]
  • Kun E, Volfin P. Metabolic differences between mitochondria isolated from various tissues. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1966 Jun 13;23(5):696–701.[PubMed]
  • Mehlman MA, Walter P, Lardy HA. Paths of carbon in gluconeogenesis and lipogenesis. VII. The synthesis of precursors for gluconeogenesis from pyruvate and bicarbonate by rat kidney mitochondria. J Biol Chem. 1967 Oct 25;242(20):4594–4602.[PubMed]
  • PHARES EF. Degradation of labeled propionic and acetic acids. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1951 Sep;33(2):173–178.[PubMed]
  • Ray PD, Foster DO, Lardy HA. Paths of carbon in gluconeogenesis and lipogenesis. IV. Inhibition by L-tryptophan of hepatic gluconeogenesis at the level of phosphoenolpyruvate formation. J Biol Chem. 1966 Sep 10;241(17):3904–3908.[PubMed]
  • Ross BD, Hems R, Krebs HA. The rate of gluconeogenesis from various precursors in the perfused rat liver. Biochem J. 1967 Mar;102(3):942–951.[PMC free article][PubMed]
  • Seubert W, Huth W. On the mechanism of gluconeogenesis and its regulation. II. The mechanism of gluconeogenesis from pyruvate and fumarate. Biochem Z. 1965 Nov 15;343(2):176–191.[PubMed]
  • Shichiri M, Miller M, Woodward H., Jr Disappearance of DL-lactate-2-C14 from blood in normal and diabetic rats. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1967 Aug-Sep;125(4):1238–1242.[PubMed]
  • Shrago E, Lardy HA. Paths of carbon in gluconeogenesis and lipogenesis. II. Conversion of precursors to phosphoenolpyruvate in liver cytosol. J Biol Chem. 1966 Feb 10;241(3):663–668.[PubMed]
  • SRERE PA. The citrate cleavage enzyme. I. Distribution and purification. J Biol Chem. 1959 Oct;234:2544–2547.[PubMed]
  • Start C, Newsholme EA. The effects of starvation and alloxan-diabetes on the contents of citrate and other metabolic intermediates in rat liver. Biochem J. 1968 Apr;107(3):411–415.[PMC free article][PubMed]
  • STONER HB. Studies on the mechanism of shock; the quantitative aspects of glycogen metabolism after limb ischaemia in the rat. Br J Exp Pathol. 1958 Dec;39(6):635–651.[PMC free article][PubMed]
  • Struck E, Ashmore J, Wieland O. Stimulierung der Gluconeogenese durch langkettige Fettsäuren und Glucagon. Biochem Z. 1965 Nov 5;343(1):107–110.[PubMed]
  • TAKACS L, KALLAY K, SKOLNIK JH. Effect of tourniquet shock and acute hemorrhage on the circulation of various organs in the rat. Circ Res. 1962 May;10:753–757.[PubMed]
  • Threlfall CJ, Heath DF. Compartmentation between glycolysis and gluconeogenesis in rat liver. Biochem J. 1968 Nov;110(2):303–312.[PMC free article][PubMed]
  • Walter P, Paetkau V, Lardy HA. Paths of carbon in gluconeogenesis and lipogenesis. 3. The role and regulation of mitochondrial processes involved in supplying precursors of phosphoenolpyruvate. J Biol Chem. 1966 Jun 10;241(11):2523–2532.[PubMed]
  • Williamson JR, Herczeg B, Coles H, Danish R. Studies on the ketogenic effect of glucagon in intact rat liver. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1966 Aug 12;24(3):437–442.[PubMed]
  • Williamson JR, Olson MS, Herczeg BE, Coles HS. Control of citrate formation in rat liver mitochondria. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1967 Jun 9;27(5):595–600.[PubMed]
  • Heath DF. The redistribution of carbon label by the reactions involved in glycolysis, gluconeogenesis and the tricarboxylic acid cycle in rat liver. Biochem J. 1968 Nov;110(2):313–335.[PMC free article][PubMed]