Skip to content

Eleksyon Sa Pilipinas Essay Format

← 1981February 7, 19861992 →
Turnout78.8% 2.1%
NomineeCorazon C. AquinoFerdinand E. Marcos
Running mateSalvador H. LaurelArturo M. Tolentino
Popular vote7,502,601 (NAMFREL) 9,291,716 (COMELEC)6,787,556 (NAMFREL) 10,807,197 (COMELEC)
(COMELEC, later nullified)
(COMELEC, later nullified)

Election results per province/city.

The Presidential election was held on 7 February 1986 in the Philippines were snap elections, and are popularly known as the Snap Elections, that followed the end of Martial Law and brought about the People Power Revolution, the downfall of PresidentFerdinand E. Marcos, and the accession of Corazon C. Aquino as President.


Influence of the American Media[edit]

After being dared by an American journalist, President Ferdinand E. Marcos declared a snap election during an interview on the American Broadcasting Company political affairs programme, This Week with David Brinkley in November 1985.[1][2][3] On 3 December, the Batasang Pambansa passed a law setting the date of the election on 7 February 1986[4] On 4 February 1986, Marcos declared 6 and 7 February as nationwide non-working special public holidays to "give all registered voters fullest opportunity to exercise their right of suffrage."[5]

The courage and the essential goodness of Corazón Aquino was so impressive in her battle against enormous odds. And the bravery of her followers— many of whom were killed as they pursued their belief in a true democracy... And then there was this: the role of the press, print and electronic. Through television cameras and newspapers, the whole world was watching. President Marcos could lie and cheat, but in the end he could not hide.[6]

—Tom Brokaw, NBC Nightly News

The assassination of Senator Benigno "Ninoy" Aquino Jr. on August 21, 1983 revived the oppositionist press, and not far behind it did the pro-Marcos press retaliate. Both catered to the intense news-hunger of the Filipino people, but it was a smaller group of reporters who delivered the crucial blow to President Ferdinand E. Marcos' image, with rumors circulating about Marcos' hidden wealth and war record. An example of this would be the article written by Eduardo Lachica in December 1982. It stirred interest after being published in The Asian Wall Street Journal on the alleged Marcos property holdings in New York.[6]

By late January 1985, the pursuit for the truth behind the rumors began with Lewis M. Simons, a Tokyo-based correspondent for the San Jose Mercury News, who sent a memo to his desk editor, Jonathan Krim. There have been incessant speculations of Philippine "capital flight" that not only involved Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos themselves, but also government officials and friends of the first family. Simons provided Krim with a list of names, telling him to look into Philippine investments in the San Francisco Bay area. Krim handed over several clips (including Lachica's article) and miscellaneous letters from the Filipino exile community to the investigative reporter Pete Carey attached with a note, "Look into this." Carey began his paper trail after setting up his personal computer and a telephone modem as well as using real-estate data bases to acquire both California and out-of-state records. Another method he used in tracking the story were his interviews with the members of the Filipino exiled opposition who were divided between those who were resolute in helping him and those who deemed themselves apolitical, fearing reprisals if they spoke. In an interview, Carey says, "I kept telling them, 'I'm not interested in quoting people, I'm not going to use yours or any names. I'm interested in documentary evidence,' That convinced people...." Due to budgetary concerns, He continued his trail by exploring records in New York and Chicago through telephone. At a later date, Katherine Ellison from the San Francisco Bureau, who Carey dubs as another "great investigative reporter," joined the group as they conducted interviews and convinced reluctant locals to provide essential information.[6]

On June 23–25, 1985, the Mercury News series under the by-lines of Carey, Ellison, and Simons elicited a staggering response after revealing a list of names, showing how the Filipino elite had illegally invested millions in the U.S., why real estate conditions made California a prime investment territory, and how capital flight fueled Philippine insurgency. Meanwhile, local publications in the Philippines such as Malaya, Veritas, Business Day, and Mr. and Mrs. all reprinted the series. There were protests on the streets, attempts by the National Assembly's opposition minority to file an impeachment hearing (which was quickly annulled) while President Marcos was forced to order an impartial inquiry (though it lasted briefly).[6]

The international clamor surprised the three Mercury News investigators with Carey commenting, "There's a vast difference between simple allegations and something with a factual, documentary basis," he says. "It provokes a totally different psychological reaction in the readers. Gossip stirs their apathy; facts galvanize them to action."[6]

After the successful publication of the series, newer articles were produced by the Mercury News team, among other things, such as how the Manila elitists smuggled fortunes, in the form of American currency, out of the country. More reporters from The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, and The New York Times developed other angles as well. The most significant were those uncovered by Times' Jeff Gerth, who wrote on the misuse of American aid money by the Marcos' administration. Although President Marcos continued to deny these allegations, it did little to avert the consequences. His support in the congress quickly dissipated while news of his misrule endangered U.S. military interests.[6] Though revelations of Marcos' hidden wealth disparaged him in America, in the Philippines, it was the truth of his war records that did him in.

Organizing the 1986 Philippine Elections[edit]

On November 4, 1985, Sam Donaldson and George Will interviewed President Ferdinand E. Marcos on the American Broadcasting Company political affairs program, This Week with David Brinkley.[7][8] Marcos was being asked about his policies and support when, without warning, he announced that he would hold a Snap Elections on February 7, 1986, a year earlier than the supposed 1987 elections. Marcos said that in the Snap Elections, the vice president would also be determined. Also, the final decision regarding the elections would be determined by the National Assembly. On 3 December 1985, the Batasang Pambansa passed a law setting the date of the election on 7 February 1986.[9]

Marcos declared the early elections since he believed that this would solidify the support of United States, silence the protests and criticisms both in the Philippines and the United States, and finally put the issues regarding the death of Benigno Aquino Jr. to rest.[10]

The opposition saw two problems regarding the announcement of Marcos. First is the credibility of the announcement since at the time two-thirds of the national assembly were from KBL, which means that they could decide not to push through with the Snap Elections. This would then give Marcos an image that he was willing to entertain opposers, which would then contribute to his popularity. Second problem is that the opposition was yet to choose a single presidential candidate to who had a chance to win.[10] This posed a problem for them since the opposition were yet to be united, supporting only one presidential candidate.

For the opposition, they were torn between the widow of Benigno Aquino Jr., Corazon "Cory" Aquino, and Doy Laurel, son of President Jose P. Laurel. Cardinal Jaime Sin talked to both the potential candidates. Cory was hesitant to run since she believed that she was not the best and most able choice. She also feared the loss of privacy once she enters the political arena. Cory agreed to run if there was a petition campaign with at least a million signatures supporting her as a presidential candidate. Doy on the other hand, was earnest in running as president since he believed his family background, training, and experience have prepared him for the presidency.


The campaign period lasted 45 days, from 19 December 1985 to 5 February 1986.[11][4][12]

As the election campaign continued, Marcos was able to campaign in selected key cities while Aquino was able to campaign intensively and extensively, even going to remote places from the north of the Philippines to the south of the Philippines. The Aquino campaign concluded a rally that is believed to have 800 000 participants wearing yellow in Rizal Park and Roxas Boulevard forming a “sea of yellow.”[13]


About 85,000 precincts opened at seven o’clock in the morning of Election Day.[14] Each precincts was administered by a Board of Election Inspectors (BEI), wherein they were tasked to overlook the manner of voting. However, the BEI did not continuously abide by the stipulated voting procedure, which raised the impression of fraud.

The voting period was also scheduled to close at three o’clock in the afternoon but was extended to give way for people who were in line. Counting of the ballots followed and in most precincts was able to finish by six o’clock in the evening.[15]

Results showed that a huge number of eligible electorates did not vote. Out of the 26 million registered voters, only 20 million ballots were cast. This showed a decreased percentage of voters from the 1984 election, which had 89% of registered voters cast their ballots, to around 76% during the snap election.[15]

Number of Voters in the 1986 Election
Number of registered voters26,181,829
Actual Number of votes canvassed by the Batasan20,150,160
Percentage of Actual to Registered Voters76.96%

A number of disenfranchised voters were evident during the snap election.

Estimated number of Disenfranchised Voters[15]
1984 Percentage of Actual to Registered Voters89%
1986 Number of voters base from the 1984 percentage23,422,264
Actual Number of votes canvassed by the Batasan20,150,160
Estimated number of disenfranchised voters3,272,104


COMELEC[15]NAMFREL (partial; 69% of precincts reported)[16]
National Capital Region1,394,8151,614,66279410,6873,020,9581,312,5921,530,6782,843,270
Region I1,239,825431,8772823,3991,675,383578,997282,506861,503
Region II856,026139,666111381996,184188,556105,934294,490
Region III1,011,8601,008,1572432,2682,022,528647,318761,7711,409,089
Region IV1,190,8041,425,1433363,8312,620,114757,689995,2381,752,927
Region V433,809761,5382583761,195,981354,784634,453989,237
Region VI902,682777,3123862441,680,624582,075561,1771,143,252
Region VII773,604827,9124,0123941,605,922535,363722,6311,257,994
Region VIII627,868411,2844752131,039,840527,076372,179899,255
Region IX540,570365,1953,686505909,956234,064256,819490,883
Region X563,547519,8418,2442231,091,855293,799308,751602,550
Region XI609,540662,79913,4137731,286,525353,413404,124757,537
Region XII662,247346,3301,8013581,010,736166,636222,418389,054

The COMELEC proclaimed Marcos as the winner[14] with more than 1.5 million voted greater than the next contender, Cory Aquino. In the COMELEC's tally a total of 10,807,197 votes was for Marcos alone. Conversely, NAMFREL's partial tally had Aquino winning with more than half a million lead.


National Capital Region1,411,8631,366,162219,763-1,323,2011,288,285231,318
Region I1,173,312394,25596,257-552,624246,68167,111
Region II825,886150,5388,111-176,739102,5373,879
Region III984,045920,095104,957-664,601741,29491,386
Region IV853,6001,691,01158,524-504,3641,221,01444,349
Region V388,961774,33625,654-328,526653,02523,772
Region VI814,910783,18356,910-542,428573,44744,362
Region VII790,432799,5657,571-552,760694,3777,296
Region VIII606,648403,66021,931-506,552377,73522,243
Region IX531,457359,5025,192-233,765252,3714,843
Region X552,528519,5027,451-397,572421,1077,543
Region XI599,462635,70137,640-422,444464,81333,565
Region XII601,020375,59512,224-179,717213,2397,922
Summary of Election Results
Ferdinand MarcosKilusang Bagong Lipunan (New Society Movement)10,807,19753.62%
Corazon AquinoUnited Nationalist Democratic Organization9,291,71646.10%
Reuben CanoySocial Democratic Party34,0410.17%
Narciso PadillaMovement for Truth, Order and Righteousness23,6520.12%
Arturo TolentinoKilusang Bagong Lipunan (New Society Movement)10,134,13050.65%
Salvador LaurelUnited Nationalist Democratic Organization9,173,10545.85%
Eva Estrada KalawLiberal (Kalaw Wing)662,1853.31%
Roger AriendaMovement for Truth, Order and Righteousness35,9740.18%
Ferdinand MarcosKilusang Bagong Lipunan (New Society Movement)6,532,362-
Corazon AquinoUnited Nationalist Democratic Organization7,158,679-
Arturo TolentinoKilusang Bagong Lipunan (New Society Movement)6,385,293-
Salvador LaurelUnited Nationalist Democratic Organization7,249,925-
Eva Estrada KalawLiberal (Kalaw Wing)589,589-


The final results of the February 7, 1986 Snap Elections led to the popular belief that the polls were tampered and considered an electoral fraud. The following days consisted of countless debates and actions as a sign of aversion to the result. Violence was at a peak. Anyone who got in the way would get murdered even in broad daylight. But in the end, as according to the International Observer Delegation, the "election of the February 7 was not conducted in a free and fair manner" due to the influence and power of the administration of Ferdinand Marcos. The International Observer Delegation reaffirmed that the proclamation of the victors of the election were invalid because the Batasan “ignored explicit provisions of the Philippine Electoral Code [Batas Pambansa Blg. 881] requiring that the tampered or altered Election Returns be set aside during the final counting process, despite protests by representatives of the opposition parts”. After further investigation, a multinational team of observers cited cases of vote-buying, intimidation, snatching of ballot boxes, tampered election returns and the disenfranchisement of thousands of voters[17]

On 9 February, thirty five computer programmers walked out of the COMELEC's electronic quick count at the Philippine International Convention Center, some fearing for their safety and seeking sanctuary in Baclaran Church. The technicians—whose protest was broadcast live on national television—claimed that the Marcos camp had manipulated the election results.

The Catholic Bishop's Conference of the Philippines President Cardinal Ricardo Vidal released a declaration in lieu of the Philippine Church Hierarchy stating that "a government does not of itself freely correct the evil it has inflicted on the people then it is our serious moral obligation as a people to make it do so." The declaration also asked "every loyal member of the Church, every community of the faithful, to form their judgment about the February 7 polls" telling all the Filipinos "[n]ow is the time to speak up. Now is the time to repair the wrong. The wrong was systematically organized. So must its correction be. But as in the election itself, that depends fully on the people; on what they are willing and ready to do."[19] The United States Senate passed a resolution stating the same. This chain of events eventually led to the resignation of Marcos' Defence MinisterJuan Ponce Enrile, and Armed Forces Vice-Chief of Staff General Fidel Ramos. Enrile and Ramos then secluded themselves in the military and police headquarters of Camp Aguinaldo and Camp Crame, respectively, leading to the People Power Revolution from 22–25 February 1986, which toppled the Marcos regime.

The snap elections and its aftermath are dramatized in the 1988 film A Dangerous Life.

See also[edit]


  1. ^Russell, George (18 April 2005). "The Philippines: I'm Ready, I'm Ready". Time. 
  2. ^"Philippines - The Snap Election and Marcos's Ouster". Retrieved 25 June 2017. 
  3. ^
  4. ^ ab"B.P. 883". Retrieved 25 June 2017. 
  5. ^
  6. ^ abcdefBain, David Haward (1986). "LETTER FROM MANILA". Columbia Journalism Review. 25: 28–31 – via Communication & Mass Media Complete, EBSCOhost. 
  7. ^Russell, George (2005-04-18). "The Philippines: I'm Ready, I'm Ready". Time. ISSN 0040-781X. Retrieved 2016-11-15. 
  8. ^"Philippines - The Snap Election and Marcos's Ouster". Retrieved 2016-11-15. 
  9. ^"B.P. 883". Retrieved 2016-11-15. 
  10. ^ ab"Turmoil, transition...triumph? The democratic revolution in the Philippines". Retrieved 2016-11-15. 
  11. ^While Batas Pambansa Blg. 883 mandated a campaign period starting on 11 December 1985, this law was put on hold until the Supreme Court upheld its constitutionality on 19 December.
  12. ^
  13. ^Santos, Antonio (1987). Power politics in the Philippines: The Fall of Marcos. Quezon City: Center for Social Research. pp. 22–25. 
  14. ^ ab"Nation commemorates 25th anniversary of the 1986 Snap Presidential Election"(PDF). Election Monitor. 1- Issue No. 61. 2011 – via NAMFREL. 
  15. ^ abcdefAtwood, J. Brian; Schuette, Keith E. "A Path to Democratic Renewal"(PDF): 350 – via National Democratic Institute for International Affairs and National Republican Institute for International Affairs. 
  16. ^ abc"NAMFREL". Retrieved 2016-11-19. 
  17. ^(PDF) 
  18. ^

External links[edit]

Radio commercials[edit]

Eleksyon Sa Pilipinas Essay

Public on 04 Mar, 2018 by Mansyur Shodiq

Stunning rtl design engineer resume stunning : Essay questions on greek mythology , Is homework helpful or harmful essay naima s | News , Ideas of 19 [ legal free flow chart : Marketing information system essay example topics and samples : Example of cover letter format sample cover : Awesome collection of xiaotime 12a february . Infographic quick guide for overseas pinoy voters abs - Stunning rtl design engineer resume eleksyon sa pilipinas essay , resume resume for study foreclosure litigation paralegal resume elegant , Eleksyon sa pilipinas essay electric mechanic , Benefits manager resume manager resume samples pinterest | Yorku psychology research paper . Posted | Essay on the runaway slave | Family tree mar roxas : Cover letter accompanying legal secretary class school secretary . Eleksyon sa pilipinas essay writer slideshare : gathering invitation card are perfect ideas to .

Popular POSTS: Eleksyon Sa Pilipinas Essay
Related Resume and Cover Letter: Eleksyon Sa Pilipinas Essay


Copyright 2018 , Inc. All rights reserved
Any content, trademarks, or other material that might be found on the this website that is not our property remains the copyright of its respective owners. In no way does this website claim ownership or responsibility for such items, and you should seek legal consent for any use of such materials from its owner.